website hit counter

America’s war on terror comes home to roost

Opinions and Debates No Comments

The Nazification of the United States

By Paul Craig Roberts, Counterpunch, Aug. 27-29, 2010

Chuck Norris is no pinko-liberal-commie, and Human Events is a very conservative publication. The two have come together to produce an important article, “Obama’s US Assassination Program.”

It seems only yesterday that Americans, or those interested in their civil liberties, were shocked that the Bush regime so flagrantly violated the FlSA law against spying on American citizens without a warrant. A federal judge serving on the FISA court even resigned in protest to the illegality of the spying.

Nothing was done about it.  “National security” placed the president and executive branch above the law of the land. Civil libertarians worried that the US government was freeing its power from the constraints of law, but no one else seemed to care.

Encouraged by its success in breaking the law, the executive branch early this year announced that the Obama regime has given itself the right to murder Americans abroad if such Americans are considered a “threat.”  “Threat” was not defined and, thus, a death sentence would be issued by a subjective decision of an unaccountable official.

Article continues . . .

8th Annual Sol Kanee Lecture on International Peace and Justice

Upcoming Events No Comments

8th Annual Sol Kanee Lecture on International Peace and Justice

with Distinguished Speaker Dr. Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela, University of Cape Town

Topic: “Exploring Narratives of Repair and Healing in the Post-Holocaust Era”
Date: Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Place: Manitoba Room, 2nd Floor University Centre, University of Manitoba
Free Admission | Parking is extremely limited—Public transportation is highly recommended

More information: Mauro Centre

See also: Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela

Backgrounder: The U.S. – Iran Standoff

Opinions and Debates No Comments

By CASMII, August 16, 2010

The current U.S. standoff against Iran, like the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, was instigated by the neoconservatives of the Bush Administration based on their doctrine of “maintaining U.S. pre-eminence, thwarting rival powers and shaping the global security system according to U.S. interests”. In the case of Saddam’s regime, its fictitious Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and its alleged links to Al-Qaida were used in the U.S. propaganda war to first impose U.N. sanctions and eventually invade Iraq. We now have a déjà vu situation in which the U.S. and its allies, prodded by Israel, demonize Iran as a threat to world security and accuse it of having a program to develop nuclear weapons. As with Iraq, the real aim is a regime change in Iran to set up a U.S. puppet government in this oil- and gas-rich country in the key strategic Persian Gulf region. This has also happened before in the 1953 U.S.-British coup in Iran. The same forces in U.S., U.K., Israel and allies today distort the truth and engage in deceit, coercion and aggression to achieve their goals. We will briefly examine some of the key facts in the standoff.

Article continues . . .

March against war with Iran

Upcoming Events 1 Comment

Date: Saturday, August 28, 2010

Times:

11:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.: Program features music performed by Winnipeg’s famed Papa Mambo

1:00: March begins

Place: Manitoba Legislative Building, Winnipeg, MB

Organized by: Crazy for Peace

In preparation for the Saturday march, Crazy for Peace will hold a series of rallies at the Manitoba Legislature:

  • Tuesday, August 24: 12:00 p.m.-2:00p.m.
  • Wednesday, August 25: 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m.
  • Thursday, August 26: 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m.
  • Friday, August 27: 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.

Background

  • Are we crazy for noticing the exponentially mounting world political tension surrounding Iran’s nuclear capacity?
  • Are we crazy for hearing loud and clear the message of the former US ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, that Israel has only until Saturday, August 21, 2010 to launch a military attack on Iran’s emerging nuclear power plant?
  • Are we crazy for being alarmed that Iran says it will defend itself against any military attack on its nuclear facility with whatever means it can?
  • Are we crazy for noticing that the Canada Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade has advised Canadians to “Avoid Non-Essential Travel” to Iran and to “Avoid All Travel” to the “Region” surrounding Iran?
  • Are we crazy for wanting to persuade President Barack Obama not to enter into nuclear attacks against Iran?

Or are others crazy? For not noticing the geo-political and military crucible heating up over Iran’s nuclear power success? or for noticing but not worrying about the fallout of nuclear attacks and counter-attacks in our own cities?
Fine, we’re the crazy ones.

We’re crazy for peace.

Crazy for Peace 2010 emerged in Winnipeg, Canada in August 2010 as a grassroots organization of Latino-Canadians who are alarmed about the growing political and military tensions over Iran’s nuclear power capacity.

Military strikes by Israel or the US against Iran to pre-empt the success of their nuclear power plant have been foretold. Iran warns it will use its own military arsenal to defend itself against any interference with its nuclear power plant. The  deadlock of positions threatens to boil over rapidly as success of Iran’s power plant is imminent at the end of August 2010.

Crushing Iran is the US and Israeli reaction of intolerance to increased power by any state other than the US in the region. After the international debacle caused by the US invasion of Aghanistan and Iraq, who in their right mind would support another US attack in the same region?

Are we crazy for saying, “Oh no, not this time! This time we say  ‘NO’ loud and clear!”

More information:

Help promote the rallies: Download the Crazy for Peace leaflet.

Chalk 4 Peace

Upcoming Events No Comments

Date: August 28, 2010

Time: 2:00 p.m. – 11:00 p.m. (If it rains the event will be postponed until the following day, August 29th.)

Place: Vimy Ridge Park, Winnipeg

Chalk 4 Peace is a global event. It happens in many cities across the planet and spreads to more and more every year.

The first Chalk 4 Peace in Winnipeg was started by Sathya Dhara back in 2007, with help from friends.

Come out and draw some art on the sidewalks and see how the pavement transforms throughout the day. With everything going on in this crazy planet of ours the world can always use a little bit more peace. If anybody wants to get involved and help out in any way that would be awesome, just give us a shout (on Facebook).

Invite your friends and spread the word!

We will be taking donations on-site for War Child Canada.

There will be bands (acoustic), drum jams, face painting, fire spinning and some other surprises.

More information on Facebook.

Bill Siksay speaks for a Canadian Department of Peace

Audio & Video, Manitoba News, Opinions and Debates No Comments

redriverpete | 08 August 2010

Aug. 6, 2010: Member of Parliament Bill Siksay was the keynote speaker at Winnipeg’s annual Lantern Ceremony, held to commemorate the atomic bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. His topic: a private member’s bill before the House of Commons calling for the creation of a federal Department of Peace.

For more information, visit the Campaign to Establish a Canadian Department of Peace.

Why America dropped “The Bomb”

Opinions and Debates No Comments

Why World War II ended with Mushroom Clouds
65 years ago, August 6 and 9, 1945: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

The Hiroshima Peace Memorial (Genbaku Dome) was the only structure left standing in the area where the first atomic bomb exploded on 6 August 1945. Through the efforts of many people, including those of the city of Hiroshima, it has been preserved in the same state as immediately after the bombing.

by Jacques R. Pauwels, Global Research, August 6, 2010

On Monday, August 6, 1945, at 8:15 AM, the nuclear bomb ‘Little Boy” was dropped on Hiroshima by an American B-29 bomber, the Enola Gay, directly killing an estimated 80,000 people. By the end of the year, injury and radiation brought total casualties to 90,000-140,000.[1]

On August 9, 1945, Nagasaki was the target of the world’s second atomic bomb attack at 11:02 a.m., when the north of the city was destroyed and an estimated 40,000 people were killed by the bomb nicknamed ‘Fat Man.’ The death toll from the atomic bombing totalled 73,884, as well as another 74,909 injured, and another several hundred thousand diseased and dying due to fallout and other illness caused by radiation.[2]

In the European Theatre, World War II ended in early May 1945 with the capitulation of Nazi Germany. The “Big Three” on the side of the victors – Great Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union – now faced the complex problem of the postwar reorganization of Europe. The United States had entered the war rather late, in December 1941, and had only started to make a truly significant military contribution to the Allied victory over Germany with the landings in Normandy in June 1944, less than one year before the end of the hostilities. When the war against Germany ended, however, Washington sat firmly and confidently at the table of the victors, determined to achieve what might be called its “war aims.”

As the country that had made the biggest contribution and suffered by far the greatest losses in the conflict against the common Nazi enemy, the Soviet Union wanted major reparation payments from Germany and security against potential future aggression, in the form of the installation in Germany, Poland and other Eastern European countries of governments that would not be hostile to the Soviets, as had been the case before the war. Moscow also expected compensation for territorial losses suffered by the Soviet Union at the time of the Revolution and the Civil War, and finally, the Soviets expected that, with the terrible ordeal of the war behind them, they would be able to resume work on the project of constructing a socialist society. The American and British leaders knew these Soviet aims and had explicitly or implicitly recognized their legitimacy, for example at the conferences of the Big Three in Tehran and Yalta. That did not mean that Washington and London were enthusiastic about the fact that the Soviet Union was to reap these rewards for its war efforts; and there undoubtedly lurked a potential conflict with Washington’s own major objective, namely, the creation of an “open door” for US exports and investments in Western Europe, in defeated Germany, and also in Central and Eastern Europe, liberated by the Soviet Union. In any event, American political and industrial leaders – including Harry Truman, who succeeded Franklin D. Roosevelt as President in the spring of 1945 – had little understanding, and even less sympathy, for even the most basic expectations of the Soviets. These leaders abhorred the thought that the Soviet Union might receive considerable reparations from Germany, because such a bloodletting would eliminate Germany as a potentially extremely profitable market for US exports and investments. Instead, reparations would enable the Soviets to resume work, possibly successfully, on the project of a communist society, a “counter system” to the international capitalist system of which the USA had become the great champion. America’s political and economic elite was undoubtedly also keenly aware that German reparations to the Soviets implied that the German branch plants of US corporations such as Ford and GM, which had produced all sorts of weapons for the Nazis during the war (and made a lot of money in the process[3]) would have to produce for the benefit of the Soviets instead of continuing to enrich US owners and shareholders.

Article continues . . .

Hiroshima Peace Declaration 2010

World News No Comments

By Tadatoshi Akiba, Mayor, The City of Hiroshima, August 6, 2010

In the company of hibakusha who, on this day 65 years ago, were hurled, without understanding why, into a “hell” beyond their most terrifying nightmares and yet somehow managed to survive; together with the many souls that fell victim to unwarranted death, we greet this August sixth with re-energized determination that, “No one else should ever have to suffer such horror.”

Through the unwavering will of the hibakusha and other residents, with help from around Japan and the world, Hiroshima is now recognized as a beautiful city. Today, we aspire to be a “model city for the world” and even to host the Olympic Games. Transcending the tortures of hell, trusting in the peace-loving peoples of the world, the hibakusha offer a message that is the cornerstone of Japan’s Peace Constitution and a beacon to the world.

The results of the NPT Review Conference held this past May testify to that beacon’s guiding influence. The Final Document expresses the unanimous intent of the parties to seek the abolition of nuclear weapons; notes the valuable contribution of civil society; notes that a majority favors the establishment of timelines for the nuclear weapons abolition process, and highlights the need for a nuclear weapons convention or new legal framework. In doing so, it confirms that our future depends on taking the steps articulated by Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the more than 4,000 city members of Mayors for Peace, and the two-thirds of all Japanese municipalities that formally supported the Hiroshima-Nagasaki Protocol.

That our cry of conscience, the voice of civil society yearning for a future free from nuclear weapons, was heard at the UN is due in large measure to the leadership of His Excellency Ban Ki-moon, who today has become the first UN Secretary-General to attend our Peace Memorial Ceremony. President Obama, the United States government, and the 1,200-member U.S. Conference of Mayors also wielded their powerful influence.

This ceremony is honored today by the presence of government officials representing more than 70 countries as well as the representatives of many international organizations, NGOs, and citizens’ groups. These guests have come to join the hibakusha, their families, and the people of Hiroshima in sharing grief and prayers for a peaceful world. Nuclear-weapon states Russia, China and others have attended previously, but today, for the first time ever, we have with us the U.S. ambassador and officials from the UK and France.

Clearly, the urgency of nuclear weapons abolition is permeating our global conscience; the voice of the vast majority is becoming the preeminent force for change in the international community.

To seize this unprecedented opportunity and actually achieve a world without nuclear weapons, we need above all to communicate to every corner of our planet the intense yearning of the hibakusha, thereby narrowing the gap between their passion and the rest of the world. Unfortunately, many are unaware of the urgency; their eyes still closed to the fact that only through luck, not wisdom, have we avoided human extinction.

Now the time is ripe for the Japanese government to take decisive action. It should begin to “take the lead in the pursuit of the elimination of nuclear weapons” by legislating into law the three non-nuclear principles, abandoning the U.S. nuclear umbrella, legally recognizing the expanded “black rain areas,” and implementing compassionate, caring assistance measures for all the aging hibakusha anywhere in the world.

In addition, the Prime Minister’s wholehearted commitment and action to make the dreams of the hibakusha come true would lead us all by 2020 to a new world of “zero nuclear weapons,” an achievement that would rival in human history the “discovery of zero” itself. He could, for example, confront the leaders of the nuclear-weapon states with the urgent need for abolition, lead them to the table to sign a nuclear weapons convention, and call on all countries for sharp reductions in nuclear and other military expenditures. His options are infinite.

We citizens and cities will act as well. In accordance with the Hiroshima Appeal adopted during last week’s Hiroshima Conference for the Total Abolition of Nuclear Weapons by 2020, we will work closely with like-minded nations, NGOs, and the UN itself to generate an ever-larger tidal wave of demand for a world free of nuclear weapons by 2020.

Finally, on this, the 65th anniversary of the atomic bombing, as we offer to the souls of the A-bomb victims our heartfelt condolences, we hereby declare that we cannot force the most patiently enduring people in the world, the hibakusha, to be patient any longer. Now is the time to devote ourselves unreservedly to the most crucial duty facing the human family, to give the hibakusha, within their lifetimes, the nuclear-weapon-free world that will make them blissfully exclaim, “I’m so happy I lived to see this day.”

See also: Hiroshima Peace Site

Israel’s Public Relations War

Audio & Video, Opinions and Debates, World News No Comments

TheRealNews | August 03, 2010

Escalating criticism of Israel led its security establishment to declare a PR war on “delegitimization.” For additional analysis, see the RealNews series entitled Who benefits from Israeli occupation?


Palestinian filmmaking culture grows from NGO project

Shooting back

Young Palestinians were given cameras and training to capture documentary evidence of Israeli abuses. That was just the start. Now they’re making their own movies


by Don Duncan, Le Monde Diplomatique, August 2010

Every Friday, the slingshot-wielding boys, or shabab, of the West Bank village of Ni’lin protest at Israel’s separation wall, which has deprived the village of 750 acres of farmland. But among the shabab are other youngsters with a different weapon – video cameras.

For the past three years, Btselem, the Israeli human rights NGO, has provided cameras and training to young Palestinians as part of its camera distribution project, to collect video evidence of abuses and misconduct by the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) and Israeli settlers in the West Bank. There are 150 such cameras all over the West Bank and Gaza, and most of the footage captured – 1,500 hours so far – ends on the floor-to-ceiling archive shelves of the Jerusalem office of Yoav Gross, who directs the NGO’s video project.

Footage captured by Btselem’s volunteers has been key evidence in Israeli court rulings in favour of Palestinian plaintiffs. The presence of cameras, now on both Palestinian and Israeli sides, has deterred violence and abuse. But three years after launching the project, Btselem has seen another, unintended consequence. “People started to take this tool, the video camera, and use it as a way to express themselves, to tell stories,” said Gross. “We didn’t train them to do that. We trained them to document human rights violations. But pretty soon we got the sense that this can be a powerful tool for them to empower themselves.”

Article continues . . .

Guantánamo is now Obama’s kangaroo court

Opinions and Debates, World News 1 Comment

Photo: Allan Lissner

Obama Bravely Takes on a Tortured Child Soldier

Torturing the Rule of Law at Obama’s Gitmo

By Chase Madar, Counterpunch, July 30-August 1, 2010

President Obama may lack the nerve to stare down Liz Cheney or Bibi Netanyahu, but no one can deny that our commander in chief has the guts to take on a child soldier. Come October, a military commission in Guantánamo will try Omar Khadr, a Canadian national captured outside Kabul in 2002, when he was just 15 years old. This will be only the third Gitmo trial and the Obama administration’s first, and there won’t be anything kinder and gentler about it.

But give our government credit for breaking new ground: no nation has tried a child soldier for war crimes since World War II, and the decision to prosecute Khadr has drawn protests from UNICEF, headed by a former U.S. national security adviser, as well as every major human-rights group. The audacity doesn’t stop there: charges against Khadr include “murder in violation of the rules of war,” a newly minted war crime novel to the history of armed conflict. Battlefield deaths do not usually result in murder trials for prisoners of war. But according to the Department of Defense, Omar Khadr is no POW. He’s a non-uniformed, “unprivileged belligerent.” In the euphemistic lingo of Gitmo, Khadr is not even a prisoner, just a “detainee” who has been awaiting trial for the past eight years.

Article continues . . .

See also:

« Previous Entries Next Entries »